Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05213
Original file (BC 2012 05213.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05213
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He receive medical continuation (MEDCON) orders for the period 
21 May 11 to 22 Jun 11 and 24 Sep 11 to 23 Dec 11.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was injured during his deployment to Turkey, but was 
erroneously released from active duty before his medical issue 
was resolved.  His MEDCON request was repeatedly declined 
because his unit failed to complete his line of duty (LOD) 
determination.  MEDCON orders were finally approved with a start 
date of 23 Jun 11.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

_________________ ______________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in 
the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).

On 3 Sep 10, the applicant was ordered to active duty in support 
of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM for the period 22 Dec 10 through 
22 Mar 11. His orders were subsequently amended with a new 
expiration date of 20 May 11. 

On 7 Feb 11, the applicant incurred an injury to his right lung. 

On 28 Feb 11, the applicant was placed on duty and mobility 
restriction.  He was prohibited from pushing or pulling greater 
than 40 pounds, repetitive bending, running, walking greater 
than 0.1 miles and restricted from flying.  The report further 
noted the applicant was undergoing an Medical Evaluation Board 
(MEB) to determine medical fitness for worldwide duty and 
retention.  The applicant was restricted from permanent change 
of station (PCS), deployment, or mobility assignment until 
disposition was determined and reflected on a new AF Form 422.  
The applicant was requested to report for re-evaluation by a 
military physician and to furnish documentation from his private 
physician indicating the diagnosis, prognosis, further 
treatment, prescribed medication, planned follow-up care, 
physical limitations, duty restrictions, and release date by 
1 Jun 11.

On 13 Mar 11, a LOD determination was initiated.  

On 20 May 11, the applicant was released from active duty and 
reverted to his traditional (part-time) status as a member of 
the Reserve.

On 9 Jun 11, the applicant’s injury was determined to be in LOD.

On 23 Jun 11, the applicant commenced a MEDCON tour  under the 
provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 12301 (h), 
which provides authority to order a member of the reserve forces 
to active duty to receive authorized medical care or to be 
medically evaluated for disability or other purposes.  A member 
ordered to active duty under this authority may, with the 
member’s consent, be retained on active duty for medical 
treatment for a condition associated with the evaluation.

On 23 Sep 11, the applicant was released from active duty and 
once again reverted to his traditional status.  However, the 
applicant had not been cleared for return to duty.  A MEDCON 
extension request was submitted and rejected to due missing 
documentation.

On 6 Oct 11, a new MEDCON request was submitted.  The request 
was declined due to discrepancies with the documentation and LOD 
issues.  On 1 Nov 11, the MEDCON request was resubmitted and on 
5 Dec 11 the request was declined due to new medical condition 
and an LOD had not been completed.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFMOA/SGHI recommends the request for MEDCON orders for the 
period 21 May 11 to 22 Jun 11 be approved.  The applicant’s unit 
failed to submit the MEDCON request in a timely manner.  Per 
MEDCON guideline had his unit submitted the request on the date 
the LOD was completed through his unit commander the applicant 
would have qualified for MEDCON orders.  However, his request 
for MEDCON orders for the period 24 Sep 11 through 23 Dec 11 
should be denied as there was no documentation provided to 
justify maintaining the applicant on MEDCON orders.

A complete copy of the AFMOA/SGHI evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluations was forwarded to the 
applicant on 17 Jul 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting 
partial relief.  We took notice of the applicant's complete 
submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the 
opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an 
error or injustice with respect to his request for MEDCON orders 
for the period 21 May 11 through 22 Jun 11.  As for his request 
for MEDCON orders for the period 24 Sep 11 through 23 Dec 11, we 
also believe that relief is warranted.  We note the comments of 
the Air Force OPR indicating that the applicant provided 
insufficient documentation to justify his retention on active 
duty orders during this period.  However, in view of the fact 
the applicant has presented evidence indicating that through no 
fault of his own, his unit repeatedly failed to timely submit a 
properly constituted request for MEDCON orders during the matter 
under review, we are not inclined to presume the unit’s requests 
related to this second period of duty were processed in 
accordance with the governing instructions.  Therefore, we 
believe it appropriate to recommend the applicant’s records be 
corrected as indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was 
not released from active duty on 20 May 2011, but on that date, 
he continued to serve on active duty for the purposes of medical 
continuation (MEDCON) until 23 December 2011, when he was 
released from active duty.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05213 in Executive Session on 22 Oct 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

	 Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Sep 12, w/atchs.
	 Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	 Exhibit C.  Letter, AFMOA/SGHI, dated 28 Jun 13.
	 Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Jul 13.
	



                                   
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01680

    Original file (BC-2012-01680.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 Oct 11, the applicant reported for follow-up where his physician continued his restrictions and directed follow-up after the second surgery. SAF/AA Policy Memorandum, Return to Active Duty of Air Reserve Component Members Unable to Perform Military Duties, dated 8 Dec 06, provides that members who are released from active duty, but subsequently become unable to perform military duty as a result of an LOD condition, will be voluntarily returned to active duty until they are fit for duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03804

    Original file (BC-2012-03804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFMOA/SGHI recommends granting the applicant’s request to remain on active duty orders and receive service points for the time period of 13 Sep through 26 Oct 12 [sic] indicating, the applicant would not have been released from active duty, but would have received six weeks of physical therapy for his injury had his injury originally been found in the line of duty (LOD). While the evidence of record indicates that his line of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01000

    Original file (BC 2013 01000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01000 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive medical continuation (MEDCON) orders for the period 17 Sep 11 to 30 Jul 12; or in the alternative she receive Incapacitation (INCAP) Pay for the period she was released from MEDCON orders. In accordance with AFRCI 36-3004, Incapacitation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05854

    Original file (BC 2012 05854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to show that he was not released from active duty on 7 Aug 12, but instead continued on active duty for medical continuation (MEDCON) until 4 Sep 12. § 1207a, a disabling condition will be found to be in the line of duty (ILOD) if it becomes unfitting, even though the condition existed prior to service (EPTS), if the member has at least eight years of cumulative active service, and the member was on active duty orders specifying a period of more than 30 days at the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03136

    Original file (BC-2012-03136.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 12 February 2012, the applicant was ordered to active duty for the period 12 February 2012 through 13 March 2012 for the purpose of MEDCON to recover from surgery and physical therapy. His profile and recommendation will be renewed until his condition has resolved adequately or it is determined that a medical evaluation board is required. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03992

    Original file (BC-2011-03992.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, we note the applicant was on active duty orders in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and was diagnosed with a medical injury. While the applicant requests continuation of his active duty orders for the period 18 Jun 11 to 9 Sep 11, we concur with the recommendation of AFMOA/SGHI to correct the record to reflect the applicant was retained on active duty orders for the period 19 Jun 11 to 27 Jul 11. ________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04716

    Original file (BC-2011-04716.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    From 1 Mar 10 to 6 Oct 11, he should have been on medical continuation (MEDCON) orders for his injuries. Per SAF/AA Memo, Return to Active Duty of Air Force Reserve Component Members Unable to Perform Military Duties, dated 8 Dec 06, “Entitlement under this policy shall begin when the condition renders the Airman unable to perform military duties, not when the injury occurred or when the Airman was released from active duty.” In this instance, the surgical date would be considered the date...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01088

    Original file (BC-2012-01088.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Continuation, Eligibility for Medical continuation, the ARC member will be eligible for Medical Continuation orders when an injury, illness, or disease is incurred or aggravated while serving on active duty and that condition renders the member unable to perform military duties." We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05257

    Original file (BC 2012 05257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFMOA/SGHI recommends denial, indicating the applicant’s initial request for MEDCON orders ended due to him failing to provide further documentation for his medical condition. Additionally, the applicant may have been receiving VA...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03094

    Original file (BC 2013 03094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03094 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive retirement points for the period 27 Sep 10 through 1 Apr 12 rather than Incapacitation Pay (INCAP Pay). In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; active duty orders for the period, 2 Jun – 26 Sep...